JUI-F Criticizes President Zardari’s Objections to Seminary Registration Bill

The Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Fazl (JUI-F) has strongly criticized President Asif Ali Zardari’s objections to the Seminary Registration Bill, calling them “astonishing” and “unlawful,” according to ARY News.

A JUI-F spokesperson stated that the President’s objections were not submitted within the constitutionally mandated timeframe. The spokesperson further claimed that the objections lacked any proposed amendments or solutions, a procedural requirement, and were not routed through the Speaker of the National Assembly as stipulated by standard practice.

The party expressed disappointment, accusing the President of attempting to delay the bill’s passage.

President’s Concerns

President Zardari raised concerns over potential contradictions within the bill and its overlap with existing laws, such as the Madrassa Education Board Ordinance 2001. He highlighted inconsistencies in the definition of a seminary across different clauses and questioned the necessity of new legislation when regulatory frameworks for seminaries already exist.

Zardari also warned that the bill could create conflicts and undermine the current legal framework governing religious seminaries.

Government Deliberations

In response to the objections, the government has initiated discussions to address the President’s concerns. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif is reportedly working to mediate a resolution, aiming to strike a balance between the bill’s objectives and the issues raised by Zardari.

Political Context

The Societies Registration (Amendment) Bill, 2024, is a key legislative priority for JUI-F. Its passage was one of the conditions set by the party to support the 26th Constitutional Amendment. The bill was passed by Parliament and sent to the President for assent but was returned with objections.

JUI-F underscored the importance of regulating seminaries while acknowledging their vital role in providing religious education. The party insists that appropriate registration mechanisms are necessary to monitor their activities effectively.

The controversy highlights growing tensions between the government and JUI-F over the bill, with its fate now hinging on further negotiations and legislative action.